OBAMA'S BIGGEST CRIME
Obama and his staff staged a scam which used federal and state public agencies, financed by the taxpayers, to deliver payola to Silicon Valley campaign financiers and sabotage the competitors of those financiers.
We have proof, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that a "Deep State" criminal organization attacked domestic U.S. citizen taxpayers who spoke out and tried to report this crime.
The term "Dark Money" refers to the hidden transfer of public funds intermixed with bribes using fake charity organizations and taxpayer dollars. Obama's staff and financiers used this tactic in the most extreme manner ever deployed.
The Silicon Valley campaign financiers, in order to protect their scheme, created the largest digital election and news manipulation technology suite in history.
THE SILICON VALLEY SANDHILL ROAD VC SOCIOPATHS
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is
an investigative journalist. In his report: ALL THE PRESIDENT’S
HACKS: MEDIA FAKE NEWS FUELED OBAMA’S WATERGATE he shows how
Obama was so twisted that he got the Silicon Valley controlled media to
help rig his fake FISA application.
When Hillary Clinton cites the “intelligence community assessment” to cast
doubt on the legitimacy of the presidential election, she’s really
repeating her own lie, that her campaign created, rolled through the media
and the government, which used it to spy on the Trump campaign, and then
finally became an “assessment” under orders from Obama carried out by
political allies like Clapper and Brennan.
The media, which once boasted of exposing Watergate, had played a key role
in Obama’s Watergate.
The release of a redacted FISA warrant application exposes the fact that
the spying on Carter Page, a figure associated with the Trump campaign,
relied on no sources other than Democrats and media allies.
In 2016, an arm of the Clinton campaign began assembling a dossier
claiming that the Trump campaign was seeking damaging information about it
from the Russians. The dossier actually represented an effort by the
Clinton campaign to seek damaging information from the Russians about the
Trump campaign.
The man tasked with that job, a former British intelligence agent named
Christopher Steele, then went on to accuse figures involved with the Trump
campaign, of doing the very thing he had been hired to do.
One of those men was Carter Page.
The Steele dossier claimed that Trump’s campaign manager, Paul Manafort,
was using Carter Page as an intermediary to work with the Russians against
Hillary Clinton. But it was Steele who had actually been hired by the
Clinton campaign to get information from the Russians to use against
Donald Trump.
The FISA application to eavesdrop on Page is based on Steele’s work and
the media echo chamber created around it. The intelligence assessment,
which former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper
admitted had been carried out under Obama’s orders, has the same tainted
origins.
A Democrat smear was used by a Democrat administration to undermine a
Republican’s victory.
The FISA application bets everything on Steele, while trying to hedge its
bets by citing news stories, because Steele’s allegations against Page are
as much of a dog’s breakfast as the rest of the dossier.
Page is variously described as “generally non-committal”, as confirming
that sanctions on Russia will be lifted, and as not stating explicitly
that the sanctions will be lifted, but implying that they will be lifted.
(Trump actually imposed more sanctions on Russia than Obama.)
But despite Steele’s sloppiness, he was useful because his past with the
Russians and the FBI meant that his claims could be used as the basis for
a government investigation of the Trump campaign.
The Steele dossier claimed that the Russians had “agents/facilitators
within the Democratic Party structure itself”. The existence of Russian
spies within the DNC should have been a far more urgent matter for a
counterintelligence investigation, but the Obama and Clinton loyalists
within the FBI and DOJ had no interest in taking a closer look at what
they knew was the tainted Dem infrastructure.
Instead, the release of the redacted Carter Page FISA application made to
the FISA court to allow Obama administration loyalists to spy on the
political opposition shows that the basis for it was a dossier ordered by
the Clinton campaign. As conservatives had repeatedly alleged, the Clinton
campaign had provided material to the Obama administration allowing it to
spy on the Trump campaign.
Despite the seriousness of the FISA application, the FBI shows no interest
in verifying the integrity of the sources of the information. Some things
are “believed” and others are “likely”. The FBI “speculates” that the
motive for the dossier is to undermine the Trump campaign. It doesn’t
bother trying to find out who paid for the dossier. There are only so many
hours in the day and you can’t check everything.
Or anything.
The application mentions that "there has been speculation in the U.S.
media that the Russian Government" was behind the DNC hack. Media
allegations and speculations fill the application. First Amendment
protections made the media very useful cutouts for the Clinton campaign.
The unredacted FISA application was based entirely on the work of
Democrats and their media allies.
Fusion GPS, the organization used to hire Steele, used its contacts in the
media and the government to seed the dossier. Then the dossier and the
news stories based on it were used in the FISA application. Its claims
about Steele’s Russian trip in 2016 are based on the unverified Steele
dossier.
The FISA application states that the FBI suspended its relationship with
Steele due to his “unauthorized disclosure of information to the press”,
yet it insists on using a Yahoo News article by Michael Isikoff, who had
received his information from Steele, as a separate source, while claiming
that it doesn’t believe that the Isikoff article was based on information
received from Steele.
The FISA application relies heavily on news stories. Beyond the Yahoo News
article, it cites allegations made in articles by the Washington Post and
Politico. No effort is made to verify any of these allegations in media
outlets famously hostile to Republicans in general and to Trump
specifically. Instead the FISA application by the government bizarrely
repeats claims about government investigations made in the media as the
basis for launching a government investigation.
The FISA application cites the Yahoo News article stating that "U.S.
intelligence officials are investigating Page". It cites the same
"intelligence reports" of the Steele dossier, without naming it, that the
FISA application is also relying on. The FBI clearly knows or suspects
that Steele is that “intelligence” source because it adds a disclaimer
about the Yahoo News article, not the Politico or Washington Post
articles.
Even once Steele admitted to having briefed Yahoo News, the FBI continued
to offer the same denial.
Its disclaimer states that the FBI doesn't believe that Steele "directly
provided this information" to Yahoo News. Why emphasize “directly”?
Because the FBI knew that Fusion GPS boss Glenn Simpson had been doing
much of the information peddling to the media. But the issue of whether
Steele had directly or indirectly provided the information on which the
Yahoo News article was based is less relevant than the fact that the FBI
was citing Steele twice, once in person and once in drag as a Yahoo News
article.
Instead of providing a second intelligence source, they offered a news
story anonymously citing an intelligence source providing information to
intelligence officials. But they were the intelligence
officials.
Media reports of the investigation, provided by Steele, were used to
create a sock puppet second source and second investigation. These echo
chamber tactics were typical of the Obama administration which routinely
seeded stories into a media echo chamber, and then used those stories to
justify its policies.
The FISA application shows that the Obama administration didn’t just
deploy its media echo chamber to manipulate public opinion, but also used
it to justify its abuse of domestic surveillance against its political
opponents.
The media has made Watergate into an essential part of its brand.
Generations of reporters have come of age at journalism schools pretending
to be Woodward and Bernstein. Not only did the media fail to expose
Obama’s Watergate, but it was a key part of the infrastructure for spying
on Republicans.
The FISA application reveals that domestic surveillance of Republicans
would not have been possible without the media. In 2016, the media had
become an official part of ‘All the President’s Men’. The reporters had
become the plumbers of a political police state. Their smears were used to
eavesdrop on political opponents and cast doubt on the outcome of a free
and open election.
The media claims that it safeguards democracy. The FISA application shows
it’s a threat to democracy.